[discuss] Should CLUE sign up to "ACTA belongs to the past"?

[G. Matthew Rice]

Well, it's a symptom of a bigger problem, IMO, but it's gets a +1 from me, too.

--matt

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:
> Count me in the "hell yeah" camp on this one.  We oughtta be part of it.
>
> - Evan (sent from my Android phone)
>
> On 5 Jul 2010 10:13, "Russell McOrmond" <russell at flora.ca> wrote:
>
> Check out:
>
> open letter - 59 NGOs signatories so far! - add yours! http://ur1.ca/0hrjm
> "ACTA belongs to the past."
>
>  After reading this, do the participants here think CLUE should sign on?
>  What are peoples thoughts about what they have heard about ACTA, the
> so-called "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement" which most believe has
> little to do with counterfeiting or trade.
>
> --
>  Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
>  Please help us tell the Canadian Parliament to protect our property
>  rights as owners of Information Technology. Sign the petition!
>  http://fix.billc32.ca/petition/ict/
>
>  "The government, lobbied by legacy copyright holders and hardware
>  manufacturers, can pry my camcorder, computer, home theatre, or
>  portable media player from my cold dead hands!"
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at cluecan.ca
> http://www.linux.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at cluecan.ca
> http://www.linux.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>



-- 
G. Matthew Rice <mrice at lpi.org>                         gpg id: EF9AAD20